Visit luckydog's column >>

LUCKYDOG

Honest differences are often a healthy sign of progress - Ghandi
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 11; Links Seeded: 2656
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 11/27/2009

Debate Over New National Energy Grid Complicated

News Type: Event — Seeded on Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:16 PM EDT
advertisement

WASHINGTON — While most lawmakers accept that more renewable energy is needed on the nation's grid, the debate over the giant climate-change and energy bill now before Congress is exposing a fundamental rift. For many players, the energy not only has to be clean and free of carbon-dioxide emissions, it also has to be generated nearby.

The division has set off a fight between Eastern and Midwestern politicians and grid officials over parts of the bill dealing with transmission lines and solar and wind energy. Many officials, including President Obama, say that the grid is antiquated and that thousands of miles of new power lines are needed to allow construction of wind farms and solar fields in the most promising spots. Many of the best wind sites are in the Midwest, far from the electric load in populous East Coast cities.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.5
{"commentId":8211809,"authorDomain":"luckydog"}
luckydog

A complicated issue for sure but isn't it nice to have choices?

{"commentId":8211809,"threadId":"626541","contentId":"3026063","authorDomain":"luckydog"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:18 PM EDT
{"commentId":8212794,"authorDomain":"mightyblogger"}
Pacific Northwest Blogger

Midwest vs western states.

Can't both have their cake and eat it too?
Energy demand is only going to rise over time.
Might as well build redundancy into it.

{"commentId":8212794,"threadId":"626541","contentId":"3026063","authorDomain":"mightyblogger"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:01 PM EDT
{"commentId":8213959,"authorDomain":"luckydog"}
luckydog

Good point PNB. I think the best answer for the country is going to be both local and national sources of renewable energy. It's not like we are going to have too much energy anytime soon.

{"commentId":8213959,"threadId":"626541","contentId":"3026063","authorDomain":"luckydog"}
    Reply#3 - Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:07 PM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"626541","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"626541","contentId":"3026063"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking
    Back To Top | Front Page